Omission of History and/or Exclusionary Detailing

Dr. David Imhotep Interview 
"The First Americans Were Africans"

First America were Black Aborigines

In the 1400s, the Portuguese crown explored the African coast. During this period, commonly regarded as portending the age of "Exploration and Discovery and European Colonialism," the kings of various European nations sought justification for their actions to legitimize their new-found prizes and trail way to wealth.
After the European invasion of America in 1492, Native Americans--Indigenous (Black) People present in what we now know as the US were enslaved by Europeans who conquered the land. During this era, a "depopulating" of America occurred. Because of the depopulation and dying off Indigenous people, a shortage of free labor occurred, and the Europeans came up with an idea to start the Atlantic African slave trade to increase the dwindling slave numbers. Five Hundred Thousand (500,000) slaves were transported to the United States from Africa during the 310-year Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade. The question here is who were the 600,000 slaves that were reported in the Colonies between 1607 (Virginia) and (1733) Georgia before the slave trade got into full-swing? African people transported here plus the number of enslaved must have been counted in the slave number count before the arrival of slaves from Africa. If only 500,000 slaves were imported from slave slips over the 310-year period, does that account for the 4,500,000 slaves freed after the Civil War?
Black Indigenous Americans owned one million square miles of land in the Louisiana Territories and the South Eastern/Florida region, as well as California. In all areas of the U.S., Black American Nations existed before Columbus arrived. The indigenous people found themselves targeted for enslavement due to the Papal Edict (Catholic Church) giving the Christian nations of Europe the go-ahead to make slaves of all descendants of Ham found in the newly discovered lands of the Americas. If Europeans got the go-ahead to enslave all of Ham's descendants, wouldn't it make sense the Native Americans they enslaved looked like the Africans brought on ships during the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Era?

That's why the numbers don't add up!
Black Indigenous Americans were captured during warfare and enslaved. Puritan New England, Virginia, Spanish Florida, and the Carolina colonies engaged in large-scale enslavement of Native Americans, often using Indian proxies to wage war giving them exact acquisition to Natives making it easier to enslave. In New England, slave raiding accompanied the Pequot War and King Philip's War, but declined after the latter war ended in 1676. Enslaved Indians (Native Americans) were in Jamestown from the early years of the settlement, but large-scale cooperation between English slavers and the Westo and Occaneechi peoples, whom they armed with guns, did not begin until the 1640s. The Carolina slave trade, which included both trading and direct raids by colonists, was the largest among the British colonies in North America estimated at 24,000 to 51,000 Native Americans.
According to US History books, 12,000,000 slaves were transported to North, Central and South America, but only 10,240,000 survived. Statistical evidence claims there were 366,000 slaves transported to the United States after the 310-year slave trade, but over 4,500,000 slaves were present on US soil and freed after the Civil War. Doesn’t that leave a little over 3.5 million slaves not accounted for unless there was that many births? Wouldn't every woman have to give birth to 10 children in her lifetime?  Maybe that accounts for the millions of people who "crossed the color line."
While many Africans were kidnapped in Africa, many West Africans had a number of kingdoms and empires in the Southern parts of the U.S. They were captured, had lands taken and tribe members sold into slavery. The Africans present had a continuing connection with West Africa including trade and commerce on the very eve of European invasion to the Americas. As recently as the 1800s, the U.S. fought with a Black nation in California called the ’Black Californians." That Black nation ended up on slave plantations in the U.S., and some sent to salt mines in Mexico.
The French and Spanish have documentation on the Black Washitaw Nation who once owned much of the annexed Louisiana Territories. In fact, the Washitaw Nation regard the states of Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma and Mississippi as Washitaw Proper. The Washitaw Nation is recognized by nations around the world as one of the most ancient nations in the Americas. 
Present states included in part or whole of the Louisiana Purchase were: Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. Present states that were included in part or whole of the Louisiana Purchase were: Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming.
Toussaint L’Ouverture (leader of Haitian Revolution) brought the pressure to Napoleon Bonaparte causing Napoleon to sell Louisiana to the United States for two cents per acre. Thomas Jefferson (Third President) was negotiating with the French to purchase New Orleans for an estimated price of ten million dollars. Jefferson wanted control of the port at New Orleans where millions of dollars in exports was leaving its shores and making America wealthy. In 1804, Toussaint L´Ouverture drove Napoleon Bonaparte's French Army from Haiti. This was the world's first successful slave revolt. For this revolt, Haiti continues to pay for the rebellion. Haiti's independence was ignored until the 1860's. In the 18th century, Haiti was the richest colony in the New World. Now it is the poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere.
Napoleon came to power in 1799. Dreaming of a renewed French empire, he secured the return of the Louisiana territory from Spain via the Third Treaty of San Ildefonso the following year, and through other agreements. These pacts were initially secret, and newly inaugurated American President Thomas Jefferson learned of them in 1801. Fearing that the port of New Orleans would be closed to American shipping, he sent former Virginia senator James Monroe to France to assist American Minister Robert Livingston in purchasing the lower Mississippi; Congress appropriated $2 million for the purpose. The Louisiana Purchase doubled the size of the United States, and this land belonged to the Washitaw Nation. Napoleon lost a fierce battle in Saint-Dominique (present-day Haiti) to L'Ouverture that took up much needed resources and cut off the connection to the ports of North America’s southern coast.
When the Americans met with Napoleon, they found that the emperor desired to sell the entire territory, much of which was unmapped and unexplored by White men; Napoleon was faced with defeat in revolting Haiti and feared that the British would capture New Orleans, meaning he would lose Louisiana with no compensation. After some haggling, they agreed on a price of 60 million francs, plus 20 million more to pay claims by American citizens against France—a total of some $15 million, which paid for some 828,500 square miles (2,146,000 km2) of land. The treaty was signed on April 30, 1803, and, although there was some question as to whether there was constitutional power for such a purchase, the American Senate ratified the treaty on October 20, 1803. The United States took formal possession two months later. President Jefferson started the government sponsored Lewis and Clark Expedition to explore the Western Part of the US and its Indian Territories.
The trend exists today to negate the Native American DNA with Indigenous Americans. A recent study from the University of Pittsburgh (2008) completed a Native American DNA comparison to find out how many African Americans had Native American Genes. The research study validated that only 4% of African Americans carry the Native American gene. The study negates or disclaims the oral tradition of Native American/Negroid connection that has been going on for centuries. In the 1950s, 83% of all African Americans had Native American blood running through their veins.
Remember, Europe had brown skin just 6,000 years ago according to a study from Scientific American. The progression of losing skin color in humans called “differentiation” and came about because of a sudden onslaught of the returning Ice Age in Europe lasting 8,000 – 12,000 years. The Ice Age caused the loss of sunlight and lack of Vitamin-D to inland people. European phenotypes appeared around 6,000 to 8,000 B.C. and Oriental phenotypes about 8,000 B.C. This also confirms Anta Diop's studies of Orientals as the admixture of Black and White. White skin is a genetic mutation when both parents carry the recessive gene incapable of producing melanin in the skin, hair, eyes and occurs more often in Africa than any other continents. Dated archeological remains of people found throughout the Americas (North, Central, and South) were present before White skin appeared on Earth. White skin did not appear on Earth until 6,000 years ago. Archaeologists have found skeletal remains of African and Asian Black people from Argentina to Chile ranging in age between 20,000 and 40,000 years referred to as Amerindians.
Genomic (chromosome) evidence indicates the Amer/Indians Gene B, C, and D are descended from African females before they migrated out of Africa 40,000 years ago. Evidence of the Black presence in America exists because of relationships between the Amerindians and African family of languages, artifacts left behind, and from the mere fact Africans were the only ones in existence in that period.
That's It--Right There! (Logic & Reason Vs Folly & Foolishness)

Traditionally, Native Americans descended from northeast Asia, arriving over a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska 12,000 years ago and then migrating across North and South America.
The PLANTATION CLASSIFICATION has no bearing here. The Thought Police left a long time ago after removing the collective identities of my ancestors. Citizens of the US have surrendered their minds and ancestral roots with the phrase— “Make America White Again” was the process used to write our current US History. The past is constantly changing but repetitively altered. Harvard scholar Henry Louis Gates who has a television show “Finding Your Roots” claims the average African American has very little Native American blood — less than 1%. Black global existence cannot be explained anymore unless using the root diminutive amplification of slavery and an African American grandmother in the closet.
Behind talk of ‘high cheekbones’ and ‘red skin tone,” Gates has another theory to push the American agenda. He claims the Americas were inhabited by Mongolian people who crossed a land bridge 12,000 years ago while Black Folks did not arrive the Americas until the 1600’s in slave ships. Gates professes that Native Americans who are Black were enslaved by Indians and later intermarried with tribe members.
Since the declaration by Gates that most African American citizens carry only European and African genes, assuredly stories told us by our ancestors are nothing more than myth. When growing up in the early 1960’s, we got Ebony Magazine in our mailboxes once a month that reported 21% of the US population was Negro. The magazine also reported that “82% of all Negroes had Indian Blood running through their veins.” So why do studies from National Geographic, The Smithsonian, and British News Agencies, coincide with what we were taught our entire lives? Now we amount to 14% of the population, and 1% of us have Native American blood. Somebody is working for the oppressor. Okay, “Overseer Gates!”
Those who have the biggest guns write history books. The US writes its own license to invade countries like Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan using the pretext of Christianity to establish Puppet Governments, peacekeeping, and humanitarian assistance. The US has invaded 20 countries in 22 years and now gives absolute credence to the CLOVIS STORY. You can give citizens the latest research, but if they have their minds made up with—HIS-STORY—no amount of facts and references can change minds when brainwashery has been implanted in every US history book.

My high school teachers applauded European scientists who affirmed my savage humanity while the same social scientists of the day defined their humanity as SUPERIOR. Case in point: Chekih Diop’s book, The African Origin of Civilization, was banned in the US since references connecting Africa to civilization was irradiated. Any information revealed about the Continent of Africa is continually termed “mysterious.” Ask yourself the following questions:

If homo sapiens appeared 200,000 years ago, it is foolish to think that Adam and Eve were the first two people on Earth 6,000 years ago.
If Native Americans (Clovis) crossed the Bering Straits 12,000 years ago on a land bridge, it is foolish to think America was uninhabited at the time. How did the Clovis people (Amerindians) become indigenous to American Continents arriving after the aboriginal people who were already here? Maybe it is akin to Christopher Columbus discovering America when the landmass was already inhabited with native people.

National Geographic and The Smithsonian Magazine report that people having the same DNA as Australian Aborigines who descended from the first humans originating in Africa 60,000 years ago came to the American continents 51,000 years before the Bering Strait crossing. The Amerindians and the Indigenous people mixed together creating the Native Americans we see today.
Linguistics of the Cherokee Tribe, for example, contain the same symbols as African Mende Script. 

The Bimini Road underwater structures near the Bahama Islands are 56,000 years old that reveal ancient Egyptian oceanic travel. Mounds like those are still in existence throughout America along with pyramid structures still intact and larger or three times the size of the pyramids of Cheops in Egypt, but anything that connects Africa to the global world is termed “mysterious.”
DNA inherited from our very distant ancestors virtually “disappears” over time, becoming extremely difficult to measure if inherited long enough ago. Fifty-thousand (50,000) years ago, all of us were Africans, as affirmed by scientists. Yet, when Dr. Gates tests White people for the show Finding Your Roots, few have any measurable African ancestry, because admixture tests are reliable only a few hundred years back.
Two types of DNA tests are used to determine heritage: mitochondrial DNA tests, which examine the genetic information stored in a cellular structure called a mitochondrion, and what are called Y-line tests, which look at markers on the Y-chromosome passed from father to son.

These tests have been widely used to examine people’s ancestral heritage. Since certain genetic variations are typical in certain areas, geneticists can use an individual’s DNA to estimate where their ancestors originated. But when this technique is used to look at someone’s nationality rather than the origin of their distant ancestors, critics say it is no longer viable. So, you have an ancient person’s genes in your DNA. How can anyone tell you this ancestor lived in or even traveled through “Africa” for example? Genes are not and HAVE NEVER BEEN tied down to any landmass any more than being tied down to a nationality.
Think about it: how many dead mummies have really been sequenced or mapped. Find a few Lemba South African mummies and pull out some of their DNA, then what? The Lemba Tribe of South Africa has 54% of the priestly Cohen Gene—40% higher than the Jewish converts (Ashkenazi European Jews) living in Israel currently. Does that mean for ancestors to be legitimate, or related to the people who currently claim to be descended from survivors of the Lemba people? The point: rare or common as it might have happened…even a small number of clans left to find new horizons taking their genes with them, history does not record it. Hence, modern researchers have no idea a person’s ancestors were ALSO “from the Lemba Tribe.” 
So, this Lemba tribe has 54% of the priestly Jewish Gene, but if the average looks at the explanations out there, they are told that Africans have this gene because maybe seven (7) of the so-called “Authentic” Jews slept with the African women of Zimbabwe hundreds of years ago. Ignorantly making a statement like that seems preposterous when the Nigerian Igbo Jews and Beta Israel of Ethiopia have roots in KJV’s Solomon. And notice the title “Beta.” The Ashkenazi Jews of Israel have been given the title “Alpha,” and this group of European converts has only been existence for 1100 years.
Consequently, researchers could extract some genetic markers suggesting a person is related to living populations whose ancestors have been established by historic and other genetic data to have lived, traveled, and sexually interacted with people from a specific and or “for best results” ISOLATED regions. With a little diligent research beyond the genome, researchers can tell who some of your ancestors probably ARE related to, but cannot, through genes alone, tell you who they are NOT related to.

According to Gates, “The number of genealogical ancestors you have from 10 generations ago is, in theory, 1,024 people, but in fact, you probably have DNA from about 500 of them” because ancestors must fall within the “window of inheritability.” He claims that few Africans arrived in this country prior to 1714. The amount of Native American DNA that we may have inherited from an alleged Native American ancestor did not disappear from genomes, since most likely that ancestor appeared many years later, within the window of inheritability.
Since we are trying to prove indigenous to the Continents, maybe Gates is correct to say that we may not have a large number “Clovis” Group Genes because we were here before this group crossed the Bering Straits and before the window of inheritability.

Look at the most recent research:

According to National Geographic, Indigenous Americans matched most closely with the native Aborigines in Australia. These people date back to about 60,000 years and descended from the first humans who originated in Africa. The researchers believe Luzia was part of a people, referred to as "Paleoamericans," who migrated into the Americas—possibly even by boat—long before the Mongoloid people (Clovis). These Paleoamericans later have been wiped out by or interbred with Mongoloids invading from the north. "Skeletal studies demonstrate that skeletal remains do not fit the Mongoloid set of traits that is determinant of the modern Amerindian morphology," "Our results demonstrate that not only are some early remains, not Mongoloid, but also some modern groups, like those of Baja California."
But recent research, including the Baja California study, indicates that the initial settlement of the continent was instead driven by Southeast Asians who occupied Australia 60,000 years ago and then expanded into the Americas about 13,500 years ago, prior to Mongoloid people (Clovis) arriving from northeast Asia.
The skulls from Baja California, which may date back only a few hundred years, have slender-looking faces that are different from the broad-cheeked craniums of modern Amerindians, the descendants of the Mongoloid people. 
The scientists say that their results demonstrate conclusively their somewhat controversial thesis: that the "Clovis" culture dating from around 13,000 years ago - which has long been thought to be the earliest human society in the Americas – which was actually preceded by human habitation at the Paisley caves in Oregon. The new study refutes every one of the critics’ arguments and uses overwhelming archaeological, strati-graphic, DNA and radiocarbon evidence to conclusively state that humans — and ones totally unrelated to Clovis peoples — were present at Paisley Caves over a millennium (1,000 years) before Clovis.   
According to Smithsonian Magazine, the small number of early American specimens discovered so far have smaller and shorter faces and longer and narrower skulls than later Native Americans, more closely resembling the modern people of Africa, Australia, and the South Pacific. "This has led to speculation that perhaps the first Americans and Native Americans came from different homelands, or migrated from Asia at different stages in their evolution." 
According to, no DNA testing can “prove” an individual is American Indian and/or Alaska Native, or has ancestry from a specific tribe. Genetic testing can provide evidence for the biological relationship between two individuals (e.g., paternity testing), but there are no unique genes for individual tribes or American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) ancestry in general. While research scientists have found that some genetic markers are found mostly only in AI/ANs, these markers are neither unique to AI/ANs nor predictive of AI/AN identity.
Apart from the Blacks who settled in Asia and Australia from prehistoric Africa, there are many tribes and nations right here in the US and the Americans such as the Washitaw Nation, the Afro-Darienite, the Choco Region Blacks of Columbia, the Garifuna who are of pre-Columbian and prehistoric origins. The Washitaw Nation built the first empire in the Southern U.S. and the Mississippi Valley and once owned the entire Louisiana Purchase Territories, which were annexed. Recently in 1991, the U.S. returned about 70,000 square acres after the Washitaw won in a court battle. The Washitaw Nations was a great civilization of Pyramid and Mound builders who had a maritime civilization and trade with Africa before Columbus.
So African Mende Script has similar writing systems to American Native Cherokee Scripts. Cherokee Script (1832-33) is an Indigenous Script in North America connected with Sub-Saharan Africa Scripts of Liberia and Sierra Leone. Also included is a relatively modern script in Liberia which may have Cherokee influence. (Cherokee & West Africa:  Examining the Origin of the VAI Script by Konrad Tuchscherer, Vol 29 2002, P. 427 to 486.)
The American Anthropological Association (AAA) asserts the US Government phase out the term “race” in collecting Federal data because the concept has no scientific justification in human biology. The analysis of genetics (DNA) indicates 94% of all physical variations remain within “racial groups.” Conventional geographic “racial” groupings differ from one another at only six percent (6%). Larger variations exist within “racial” groups than between them. In bordering populations throughout the global world there are OVERLAPPING genes and The American Anthropological Association (AAA) asserts the US Government phase out the term “race” in collecting Federal data because the concept has no scientific justification in human biology.
The analysis of genetics (DNA) indicates 94% of all physical variations remain within “racial groups.” Conventional geographic “racial” groupings differ from one another at only six percent (6%). Larger variations exist within “racial” groups than between them. In bordering populations throughout the global expressions. If the origin of humanity started in Africa, mankind came from Black Africans—ONE global Negroid Race. Members of the AAA know that continuing to use the term “race” demonstrates a further division and alteration of the recessive gene. The term “race” is being used as a CAMOUFLAGE to squelch the changing phenotypes of mankind blending together? Scientists are trying to form one BIG “Caucasian Cluster” to stop White genetic annihilation. The term “race” continues to imply inequality.
Scientific American recently featured an article about the ALU Chromosome. The Chromosome is referred to as the “Jumping Gene” and reproduces by copying and inserting itself into new chromosome locations. The latest Genome Project confirms Africans are the purest race on Earth with 95% of the gene. Europeans have 75% of the ALU Chromosome, while 60% of Asians have the same chromosome. Europeans and Asians have 50% each of the chromosomes found in each other. On the other hand, only five percent of Negroid/Africans have a chromosome found in Europeans and Asians. Scientific American records ONE global Race.
Eventually, a person becomes conscious that “hide and seek” behind the feathers is no more than a rational realization you have been hiding from yourself. The author realizes a large percentage of American Blacks have American Native ancestry. That is the story passed down, but researchers now say only 1% of All Americans with Indigenous blood have Native American History compared to 83% 30 years ago.  That is easy to figure out because we now know most Black Americans were related to the Indigenous people who inhabited the Eastern and South-Eastern part of what we know as the US. Two hundred thousand years ago the “Mound Builders” inhabited North and South America (Maclean, 1879, Blackmar, 1912). They were ebony-skinned, woolly-haired people indigenous to the Americas. If one thinks about it long and hard enough, maybe that’s why it has been so easy for Americans with indigenous ancestry to “hide behind the feathers.”
​Sources:  Andrzej Wiercinski, Alexander von Wuthenau & JA Villacorta